An Editorial Criticized A Chart Caption

47 94 an editorial criticized a chart caption that described a dental rinse as one that reduces thethe chance of plaque on teeth by over 400 percent what is wrong with this statement.

An editorial criticized a chart caption. An editorial criticized a chart caption that described a dental floss as one that reduces thethe chance ofchance of plaqueplaque onon teethteeth by overby over nbsp 350 percent 350 percent what is wrong with this statement. A reduction of 100 would eliminate all plaque so it is not possible to reduce it by more than 100. For newsworthy content to have any long term value it must include a proper editorial caption that identifies the important aspects of the image footage clip.

An editorial criticized a chart caption that described a dental rinse as one that reducesan editorial criticized a chart caption that described a dental rinse as one that reduces thethe chance ofchance of plaqueplaque onon teethteeth by overby over nbsp 400 percent 400 percent. The problem with this statement is that the percentage exceeds 100. Simply examine your image and describe what s going on.

The most you can reduce a certain amount is by 100. Chose the correct answe below. An editorial criticized a chart caption that described a dental floss as one that reduces the chance of plaque on teeth by over 400 percent what is wrong with this statement.

Answer by jim thompson5910 35218 show source. The easiest way to check your caption is to make sure it has the following qualifiers. The statement should ve stated that the dental rinse could reduce plaque up to 100 instead.

A new york times editorial criticized a chart caption that described a dental rinse as one that reduces plaque on teeth by over 300. What is wrong with this statement. An editorial criticized a chart caption that described a dental rinse as one that reduces the chance of plaque on teeth by over 300 percent what is wrong with this statement.

Who what where and when.